Are We There Yet?

Are We There Yet?
This is the sign that is over the front door of Aileen's and my house, our home, going OUT. Meaning that when someone leaves our house they are going into the ACTUAL Mental Ward.

I've always felt that way. When it is considered how much ugliness and killing and hatred there is in the world today, it actually makes perfect sense that this sign is over the door going out of the house.

Because that's where the real mental ward is.

Sunday, January 6, 2013

The Chaotic Factor

What I wrote the Journal article, Relative Values, I was attempting to make more visible the line, ideologically, that exists, between those Christians who in fact support any form of violence and those Christians who do not.  And when I use the word, Christians, in the preceding lines, I'm talking about Christians and Catholics, in all their various forms.

For anyone to think.  In our current day and age that the level of dishonesty that exists is anything peculiar is making a mistake.  Because dishonesty is really and truly been part of the human condition as far back as Socrates, Aristotle and Plato.  And of course probably before.

The point I was making regarding Christianity.  Which of course had its beginning as Catholicism, is that in reality, Christianity has not been really very honest with itself as the religion.  And subsequently that we humans have never been honest with ourselves.  Because we have continually made excuses why it is okay for us to try and kill each other rather than trying to get along.

And as I have always maintained, this is my Journal.  This is where are simply write down my observations and my thoughts and my feelings about my life.  It's where I actually write down my perceptions.  Of course it is a great deal more.  There are as I have always maintained, three basic purposes for this Journal.  To begin with, this Journal is in point of fact, the one Journal that my darling Aileen wanted to do with me, but never got the chance to do so.  And this Journal is also the continuation of the human rights efforts that Aileen and I maintained for the 18 years that we were able to be with one another.  And this Journal is my way of bearing my soul before God.  Whatever time I have left here in this world.

So when I write.  The way that I did yesterday, in, relative values.  I'm actually attempting to inspect and analyze the differences ideologically, pursuant to theology and religion and spirituality between the aspects of humanity, whereby, a huge majority of humanity subscribes to or promotes or believes in or demonstrates various forms of violence and there is forms of dishonesty in order to achieve violence or to subscribe to the violence or promote the violence or engage in the violence that is part not only of their lives but seems to be systemically a part of the entire human condition.

It is my hope and my intention that from looking at this aspect of humanity's in difference to their own dishonesty and their own inconsistency with their own ideological and theological beliefs that not only will I gain better understanding as to why we humans think it is a good idea to spend most of our resources and our time trying to murder each other.  But at the same time, that by doing this, I will actually perhaps cause or at least give the opportunity to the reader of my Journal for them to be able to have the same potentiality regarding looking at the difference between those aspects of humanity that are overly and normally quite dishonest, while at the same time being extremely violent.

And that by doing this I am then being of assistance, and some small or rather insignificant way, in attempting to help the world to actually take a look at itself regarding the violence that is going on.  And I say, specifically, in some small insignificant way.  Because that is of course the reality.  But for me not to remark on this difference between those who are violent and Rev. dishonest as compared to those who are not is truly a very important focus or an issue of focus regarding humankind's current development and humankind's manner of expression regarding the human various cultures of the world and the overall fabric of humanity itself.

.  It is not just the Catholics and Christians.  And yet the argument of violence to nonviolence is a great deal more visible, ideologically, when looking at the Catholic or Christian theological belief system.  And for obvious reasons.  So was looking at the Catholic and Christian ideological method regarding their own belief system.  It becomes extremely clear that the Catholic and Christian religions are basically predicated upon a position to nonviolence, pursuant to the sermon on the mount.  But that as soon as the Catholic and Christian religions began any kind of physical expression of their religions, they immediately began to define and those public displays or public forms of expression of the religion in terms of extremely and massive and deadly violence.

The logical conclusions stemming from the current forms of global behavior within the human condition are not only extremely visible.  But absolutely understandable.  If humanity is ever to be known for the sentient being that humanity is.  That humanity is going to have to somehow or other learn different forms of expression rather than what is culturally accepted and promoted and demonstrated and supported throughout the entire global human condition.  Meaning, the level of violence and the tremendous support for and maintenance of the industrialized military complex.

Because the choices from where humanity is ideologically with regard to the various cultures throughout the world.  These choices.  As I said are extremely visible and logical.  Because one of the mean choices for where humanity will finally come to with regard to the level of violence and dishonesty that is so systemically pervasive throughout the world, is basically a world where dishonesty and violence is no longer simply part of the world.  But in fact has become the driving forces in a world.  And that portrays a very dark world.  But, if that's what humanity wants to be known for me that humanity wants to be known for being violent and dishonest and basically hateful if that's really the direction that humanity wants to go in.  Then humanity doesn't really have many choices to make.  Because humanity is already moving very quickly in that direction.

If on the other hand humanity does not want to be known for at least portrayed as an animal species that is consumed with dishonesty and with violence then humanity obviously has different choices to make.  As to whether humanity will make those choices are not that of course is a different matter what the point is that humanity is becoming so violent and so incredibly this honest that not only is the violence becoming systemic throughout the entire human condition.  But so is the dishonesty.  And from those basic to ideological concepts, all of the various forms of violence and all of the various forms of dishonesty.

With some theological belief systems it becomes easier to see the the line between violence and nonviolence.  For example, in the case of the Christian or Catholic religions in any of their various forms.  Because the entire religion is actually predicated on nonviolence.  And yet the religion supports in so many different ways, various forms of violence.  But for anyone to think Christians or the Catholics in any of their various forms support more violence than any other of the major religions might in fact be making a mistake.  There are religions, or theological belief systems that in fact do not support any form of violence and there are some that support hardly any violence.  But of the three major religions such as Christianity, Catholicism Muslim in Judaism well, the four different religions.  The level of violence and dishonesty being supported and promoted and displayed is becoming completely out of control.  Out of control to the point where it is becoming normalized.

And that's the danger.  It's not so much of a danger.  As is obvious.  Because it is a danger, anthropologically.  Meaning culturally.  That over.  So generations the level of violence and dishonesty is simply going to become greater and greater and greater and at a certain point in the progression of generations inhumanity the level of violence and dishonesty will then become so great that it will no longer be simply something that is supported or displayed they will in fact become literally the driving force of humanity.  Meaning that almost everything in the human condition will be based upon one form of dishonesty, and/or violence, or another.

And that.  That is the real danger.  Because of humanity progresses in the direction of violence and dishonesty to the point where violence and dishonesty become literally the driving forces in humanity in one way or another.  Then humanity is as a result, creating an environment, or a world, whereby humanity will not only have a tremendously difficult time of surviving due to various environmental changes taking place.  But that humanity will actually have a much more difficult time culturally and politically and religiously being able to exist.  Because the level of violence and dishonesty will no longer be something that is simply promoted or displayed.  It will literally become the driving force throughout the entire human condition.  Which means every single thought and action will in some way be connected to violence or Dishonesty.

And that again, as I said is really the point of this Journal article.  I'm sure that there are elements of humanity on both sides of the equation.  Meaning on the side of violence and dishonesty on the one side and on the side of nonviolence and honesty on the other side who will in fact totally agree with the position I'm taking with the mass majority of people in the world who are supporting one form of violence or another.  And who are also subsequently supporting one form of dishonesty or another is becoming so prevalent in the world that is really becoming systemic meaning that it is becoming literally pervasive throughout the entire human condition.  And when something begins to achieve that level of importance or synchronicity from one culture to another.  It has the potential of becoming almost a common element in every single culture and if that happens then we are looking at cultures throughout the world.  At one point or another, generationally speaking, of becoming driven by, or based upon, violence and dishonesty.  And ideologically and conceptually and cognitively speaking, when that particular informational change takes place.  The anthropological ramifications are going to be extremely unsavory.  Because the major anthropological outcome will in fact be a world that is literally based upon or driven by violence and dishonesty.  Which means it's going to be a very violent world.  It is going to be an extremely cruel world much more so than now and it's going to be a world where individual survival has nowhere near the significance or importance that it has right now.  Because of violence and dishonesty will be driving all of us.  Just as it is the culture.

So in order to be able to see that particular difference or that variation between the elements that are supportive of violence and dishonesty as compared to those elements that are not supportive of violence and dishonesty as I said, it becomes easier to see the differences when you look at one of the most elemental arguments, pursuant to the entire condition.  And the one argument.  Theologically speaking in the human condition where the line between violence and nonviolence is actually seen a bit more clearly is in the various Christian or Catholic religions in any of their forms.  Because those religions are actually based on complete and total pacifism.  And yet those two religions have demonstrated from the very moment of their creation tremendous amounts of violence and deception even to the present day, whereby the religions are convinced totally and completely, regardless of anything that was imparted at the sermon on the mount.  But the Christian and Catholic religions are endowed with some special power by God to be the warriors here on Earth.  And to use violence and killing and deception in order to get what they want.

And once those differences between the factions are easily seen in the Catholic and Christian religions, in any of their various forms.  It then becomes just as easy to see the same differences throughout all the other theological belief systems.  And subsequently throughout the entire human condition.  And that the renewal point in all of that exercise is to then have a better idea as to the direction, anthropologically speaking, that humanity is traveling in.  As a result of this tendency for humanity to embrace various forms of violence and deception in order to normalize those forms of behavior pursuant to making the literally an integral part of humanity's various cultural expression.  Because that's exactly what is going on.

And of course, while all of this is happening, humanity is, at the same time, having a really strenuous and difficult time learning how to cope with the ever changing environmental conditions, throughout the world.  Whereby, these environmental conditions are now becoming more and more severe as a result of number of different factors.  Which over a period of time, generationally speaking, are going to be a lot more serious and significant.  To the point, whereby in reality, humanity will of course have a much harder time surviving.

So then humanity ends up in a position, anthropologically speaking, whereby humanity has a much more difficult time surviving not only as a result of the living environment in which humanity is existing.  But that humanity also has a much more difficult time of survival as a result of the choices that humanity is made pursuant to violence and dishonesty.  Whereby as a result, violence and dishonesty no longer become simply displayable forms of behavior.  But in fact have become ideologically and conceptually and cognitively the driving force or driving forces throughout the human condition from one culture to the next.  Which again, then sets up an alternative scenario of difficult or extremely challenging.  Survival.

So to the rational mind.  This kind of behavior is not only illogical.  But it is of course counterproductive to the potentially positive evolutionary progression of the human condition.  Because it is in fact making survival more difficult and actually channeling survival of the human condition into forms of expression pursuant to violence and dishonesty.  And that in reality humanity is doing this because humanity is losing its ability to understand.  Humanity's place in the scheme of all life.  Everyone's making himself more important than each of humanity is making itself more important than any other life form.  Humanity is making itself more important than anything.  And yet, in reality we are just one of billions of different types of lifeforms in the spectrum of all existence.

But trying to reason with humanity along those lines becomes basically impossible.  Because humanity has to be disposed to be willing to listen to the other side of the argument.  And humanity, for the most part, right now, is just not interested in understanding or supporting or promoting or displaying the nonviolent and more honest forms of expression.  Because if humanity actually were interested in being more honest and less violent.  Then in reality you would see slightly different dynamics going on, pursuant to the discussion of violence versus nonviolence and honesty versus dishonesty.  You would see different things in the news.  You would see different behavioral signals taking place from one culture to the next.  And we are not seeing those signals.  Which basically means that humanity is moving in the direction of becoming more violent.  Instead of less violent.  At least at this point in time.

But given this particular moment in time.  And given the fact that humanity is moving in the direction of violence and dishonesty more than in the direction of nonviolence and honesty.  It then becomes remarkably clear, generationally speaking, to be able to see the ramifications of those choices, whereby in a series of generations, however many or few it might take.  That humanity will actually be in a position where, violence and dishonesty are no longer options of behavior.  But in fact, will become the driving force of all behavior.  And that.  That is a very dangerous world.  Because not only at that point, generationally speaking, would humanity be living in a physical environment, here on Earth, whereby the environment will in fact itself.  Being much more challenging.  But at the same time, humanity will have created, for itself, and ideological, or conceptual or cognitive environment, whereby culturally speaking, humanity will have an extremely much more difficult time of survival based on the fact the violence and dishonesty will no longer be options.  But in fact driving forces or the driving force throughout most of the human condition if not all the human condition.  At that point.

And because of these two different aspects of the human condition.  The environmental and ideological.  Because these two aspects are in fact moving in the direction of violence and what might in fact be considered a form of dishonesty.  And that's really what is happening environmentally as well as culturally.  Because the signals of being able to see what is actually happening environmentally on the planet are becoming in one way more visible.  But in another way harder to see.  Just as the violence and the dishonesty is the human condition, ideologically, is also becoming more visible.  And yet also in another way harder to see.  And part of the harder to see portion of the question are the ramifications from moving further in the direction of allowing violence and dishonesty become driving forces throughout the human condition.  Because it becomes harder to see the actual ramifications of what we are doing because we are so focused on the present.

But we don't look at the ramifications of what we are doing we are in fact going to end up in a position, generationally speaking, whereby as a result, violence and dishonesty will no longer be options.  But in fact become the driving forces or driving force throughout the entire human condition which then makes survival even more difficult based on the fact that the environment is also getting difficult as well.  And that is a definite potentiality of where we're going as a result of what we are currently doing.  And it is not really visible.  Because the real effects of what we are doing very well may not be seen for two or three generations.  But by the time the services throughout the entire human condition violence and dishonesty will have changed simply from being options within the human condition to literally being driving forces.  And at that point, like I said, the human condition ceases to be anything attractive to almost any other form of life.  Because there's not one form of life unless that lifeforms extremely violent that is going to in any way feel any affinity for or want to identify with or exchange information with the human condition with human condition is based upon violence and dishonesty.  The only other forms of life the want to have anything to do with the human condition will be forms of life that are just as violent.  And just as dishonest.

And if that's really the direction that humanity wants to go in.  That is humanity's choice.  It is not the direction I want to go in.  Because I don't believe that supporting the kind of violence and dishonesty that we are throughout the human condition is either positive or helpful in any way to the positive evolutionary progressive growth of humanity.

And again, if I did not remark on this.  If I did not say anything about what I am seeing not only what I not be honest with myself.  But I wouldn't be honest with anyone.  I interact with.  Because I don't see anything positive as being the outcome of the level of violence and dishonesty that is being currently supported in our world from one culture to the next.  Because all we are basically doing is destroying tremendous amounts of historical sites.  We are destroying cultures we are destroying people's lives we're generating more hatred and racism and bigotry and ugliness we are making those things extremely more normalized and accepted.  We are teaching it to our children.

So either we get to a point where we simply come forward and admit that we love violence and love lying to each other or we get to a point where we finally admit that we really don't like the violence we don't like lying to each other or ourselves and then we simply change our behavior.  But that is a very difficult thing to not only realize.  But to also achieve especially globally, meaning from one culture to another.  So it is truly not the more likely of the two scenarios.

And that of course brings me to the question as to whether or not this is really the direction we want to move into.  Do we really want to become known as an animal species here on Earth that is basically predicated upon and dedicated to violence and lie.  Because if that's what we end up becoming we will not in any way to achieve the unlimited amounts of potential that we actually have as animal species or as an animal species.  In this world.  We will never really realize the full potential of our being sentient beings.  And that's okay.  Because if all we want to be is violent and angry and dishonest and hateful than that is exactly what the future will be.  If on the other hand we don't want our future to be extremely violent and ugly and hateful and full of lying.  Then we really do need to take a very serious look at the human condition throughout the entire world and ask ourselves better questions.  Is this really the direction we want to take our world into.

So by pointing some of those questions that the most visible of the various arguments in the human condition where it is easy to see the difference between violence versus nonviolence and dishonesty versus honesty.  It then becomes subsequently easier to see the difference between those two aspects of your question in all of the different conceptual expressions of humanity.  Meaning, politics, religion, spirituality, economics.  And so forth.  And then by looking at the different forms of expression and support for violence and dishonesty in various aspects of humanity and then at that point becomes a lot easier to see exactly where that violence and dishonesty is in fact taking humanity, again, generationally speaking.  Or what might be considered as, anthropologically speaking.

And the value of that particular writing discussion is of course to provide the reader with a better understanding of the actual potentiality regarding violence and dishonesty as it is currently being expressed and supported and promoted in our current human condition.  And that, with that understanding also from some rather profound questions one of which being of course as to whether or not we want to continue moving in that direction.

So at that point, hyperbole it actually becomes a very useful tool.  Because by using hyperbole, the writer, someone like myself, is that able to portray the exaggerations of our violence and dishonesty and to do so in such a way whereby some of these differences.  And of course the subsequent questions become more visible to the reader.  And that of course is the intention.

It's all about direction, ladies and gentlemen.  It's about the direction we want our world to go into.  It's about the direction we're taking our world into.  It's about how this violence and dishonesty we are currently promoting and supporting and demonstrating has a tremendously high potentiality of becoming so absolutely pervasive in the human condition where it basically will run the entire human condition.  And the dangers from that as I said are really rather severe because it makes humanity more of a violent and dishonest form of life that a form of life that is interested in expanded awareness or expanded intellectual understanding or informational exchange it doesn't make the human condition a very warm and friendly animal species.  It makes the human condition a very violent and dishonest form of life in the existence of all life.  And that this is exactly how humanity will be seen not only by humanity itself but by any other form of life as a result of humanity subscribing to and promoting violence and dishonesty to the point where violence and dishonesty no longer become options but in fact become the driving forces throughout the entire human condition and is driving forces that is what will be most visible to humanity and to any other form of life that humanity may interact with.

And that condition in itself will make survival in the human condition incredibly much more difficult than it currently is.  And that the difficulty of survival, pursuant to that aspect of the human condition will only be aggravated an increased as a result of environmental changes going on in the world.  So that survival.  Then becomes truly far more strenuous and difficult than it will have ever been before in the history of the human condition.  And that part of the responsibility for reducing that degree of difficulty of survival does in fact fall upon the human condition pursuant to making better choices with regard to violence and dishonesty.

But making those more difficult choices takes a much broader understanding of the potentiality of violence and dishonesty, pursuant to the human condition, anthropologically, or generationally speaking.  And then if we don't in fact looked in terms of generations or the anthropology of our own species, pursuant to the effects of violence and dishonesty we are not actually being responsible pursuant to embracing either of those aspects of ourselves or the human condition.  Because we are not looking at the potential dangers of our support or demonstration of those forms of behavior really are going to be to the human condition, once again, anthropologically or generationally speaking.

And that is a real and significant danger to the human condition.  Violence and dishonesty has the potential of becoming so powerful in the human condition that it could actually take out most of humanity.  And in point of fact, there are a number of religious references to exactly that happened.  But that is a potential argument and not the only argument.  It is a potential direction and not the only direction a potential choices but not the only choice.  There are other choices that humanity can make.  But once again attempting to move humanity forward, intellectually or cognitively, to the point humanity braces more problematic thinking as compared to a symptomatic thinking is one that is extremely difficult because humanity is operating the most part, on the symptomatic logical process.  Ever since the invention of the clock.

So humanity is not going to change.  At least not readily.  And that in itself is yet another reason for why doing this particular Journal article.  It is in fact so important.  And the combination of this article.  Of course was located in a personal experience.  But the expression of the article it so did not in case or deal with only the personal experience.  But in fact was dealing with and he is dealing with the overall condition and support for violence and dishonesty that exists in the world.

Personally speaking.  The situation with my daughter and I, has improved significantly.  And that is a good thing.  But as a result of the conversation became even more clear to me that the real issue pursuant to violence in dishonesty is not one of informational location.  Meaning it is not one that has to do with one particular belief or another or one religion or another.  It actually has to do with the way that humans are in fact relating to themselves and to each other.  Whereby as a result, dishonesty and violence have become so.  Extremely significant, pursuant to the entire form of human expression or the various different forms of human expression.

So again from that point the article I wrote yesterday, then becomes really rather significant.  Because it is in fact attempting to deal with or to analyze and inspect and learn from the extremely pervasive conditions of violence and dishonesty as they are currently being rested promoted and demonstrated in the human condition.  And how that particular level of behavior or type of behavior in the human condition is actually going to progress, generationally, or anthropologically speaking, in the future.  Whereby as a result survival.  Then becomes far more difficult and uncertain than it is now.

To either we learn how to live without violence or violence will in fact probably consume most of the human condition.  And if the current population of humanity of which I am part of.  If this current population of humanity does not see the dangers in their support for a demonstration of various forms of violence.  This is a very unfortunate situation because I'm not seeing the ramifications that means the violence and dishonesty have a much stronger probability of becoming more constant factors in and driving forces of the entire human condition.  Which then of course means again.  Survival is going to be one hell of a lot more difficult in the future.  If we don't start dealing with violence and dishonesty now.  But expecting humans to do that is also almost unreasonable.  Because humanity does not have the interest, meaning the inclination, to want to even deal with the issue of violence or dishonesty.  Because of how systemic both of those aspects of humanity really are.  Throughout the entire human condition at this point in time.  And that.  That is extremely unfortunate.

Because of the said, the scenario from that is that humanity will become so violent and so dishonest that the potential scenarios of some of the feature films that have been presented in the movies and on TV, will in fact actually become potentially more likely.  In one form or another.  And to one degree of severity or another.  But if that is actually the best that humanity can do.  Meaning to reduce humanity to such anarchy and basically open warfare that's not really a very positive outcome to the 14 million years that we as humans have in fact been living in the world and how we have grown.  Because in reality allowing violence and dishonesty become the driving force within the human condition is in point of fact, not growth.  But regression.  Meaning that we are basically taking a step backward.  Not forward.  But if that's really what humanity wants to do.  To be known for violent and ugly and dishonest behavior that again, under those circumstances humanity does not have any choices to make.  Because humanity is already moving in that direction.

But it on the other hand humanity wants to move in the other direction of nonviolence and in the direction of honesty well that of course takes an entirely different set of choices.  Most of what humanity is not discussing at both of which humanity does not really show any desire of embracing or even understanding.  And as I said, that is extremely sad.  Because I happen to think that humanity is better than that.  I happen to think that we as human beings actually have the ability to become truly sentient beings where we are in fact rising above the extremely animalistic tribal forms of behavior regarding dishonesty and violence.  But given the current circumstances, I just don't see that happening anytime soon.  It may take 100 generations of us becoming more and more violent and more and more dishonest with ourselves and each other before we finally get to the point where we're sick of the violence and we finally turn away from it.  But getting to that point.  Like I said may take 100 generations because at this point in time.  We are force whereby violence and dishonesty.  Because those are the basically two most pervasive concepts of the human condition at this point.  Everyone lies and almost everyone support violence.  In one form or another.  And it's no big deal right now.  But within 10 generations or seven generations level of violence and dishonesty won't be at the same level it is right now.  It'll be much greater.  And in reality very well may in fact be driving forces throughout the entire world.  And that's the real danger.

So it's all about taking responsibility.  Not just for yourself but for the entire world.  Because we are all part of the entire world.  Whether someone is me like that are not doesn't matter.  We're all part of the world.  We all have had a effect on the world.  Granted.  If exit most people have of the world are extremely small and apparently at least on the surface quite insignificant.  But when looked upon more closely every single life in the world has a specific impact on the world.  And again, most of the impact that any given life may have on world is extremely subtle and potentially incorrect or indirectly lives of.  But it is still visible.  And it is still an effect.

And that's the whole point.  It would figure it out now or we are going to end up having a great deal more difficulty later.

Thank you very much for listening.

(For support and source documentation, and further reading, please see my "See Also:" section below.)

See Also:

The mind is like a book. Opened and much is learned. Closed and nothing is learned. (N. Maschke – 1994)

"THEY CAME FIRST for the Communists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist.

THEN THEY CAME for the Jews,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.

THEN THEY CAME for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist.

THEN THEY CAME for the Catholics,
and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant.

THEN THEY CAME for me
and by that time no one was left to speak up."

Pastor Martin Niemöller

      Child Poverty Statistics:

    • 25,000 children die each day from poverty
    • 1041 children die every hour due to poverty
    • 17 children die every minute from poverty
    • 750,000 children die every month from poverty
    • 9,000,000 children die every year from poverty

    Child mortality Statistics:

    • 9.2 million children die every year
    • 780,000 children die every month
    • 26,000 children die every day
    • 18 children die every minute

    An estimated 9.2 million children under the age of five will die this year – nearly 26,000 per day or 18 every minute. This is greater than the annual number of deaths from 1. AIDS (2 million), malaria (900,000), and tuberculosis (1.5 million) combined. 2. Neonatal disorders, pneumonia and diarrhea are the major causes of under-five mortality.

    Globally, 80 percent of all child deaths are due to only a handful of causes: neonatal causes, pneumonia, diarrhea, and malaria. 3. Pneumonia or sepsis, pre-term delivery, and asphyxia at birth are the leading causes of neonatal deaths. Malnutrition is responsible for over a third of child deaths.

    From: http://www.globalhealth.org/child_health/child_mortality/

    And, according to recent United States statistics, there are approximately 43,000 suicides that take place, in the United States every single year. That would be one suicide taking place, by children as young as 12, or possibly younger, up to our oldest citizens. Approximately every 15 minutes.

    Not one single penny that the pro-life movement spends on their so-called pro-life movement goes toward saving any of these “living” children’s lives. Not one single cent. Which means that not one single cent of the so-called pro-life movement is being used to save any of the amazing children and absolutely fantastic women, and men, who are being killed, or suffering horribly, every single minute. so naturally, it becomes impossible to conclude that the pro-life movement is pro-life at all, if they will not even save the lives of living children and men and women. But will always only be concerned with, and define life as the “fetus” only. And THAT’S NOT how their own God Jesus Christ defines life, in their own Bible.

    Which means that the pro-life movement is not pro-life at all. Because their money is “not” going to save any living life on this planet. Their money is only going toward forcing women to bear children against their will. And that’s not how their own God, Jesus Christ defines pro-life.

If The Almighty will not allow the smallest sparrow to fall from the sky, why, should we, the creations of that same Almighty, do any less?

    *******************************************

    With 78% of the population of the United States being Christian, (US Religious Demographic Statistics ) that also means that 78% of all the:

    incidents that take place every year, are committed by approximately 78% of the population, meaning people who claim to be Christians. (US Religious Demographic Statistics ). And that is something that the Christian conservatives , and those who are Catholics, never seem to want to discuss, and in many, if not most, cases, will lie about. Unless they are forced to do so, and/or tell the truth, in a court of law.


    And again, their own God, Jesus Christ says in their own Bible, not to judge anyone, and not to hurt anything that God makes. That’s anything. So, these statistics are really meant to illustrate about being responsible for one’s own choices and actions. That would be, in their own Bible, free-will choices and free-will actions.

    ******************************************

    My Statement On Religion

    For the record, I do not now, nor have I ever hated any human being on earth. I do not hate, regarding my spirituality, and spiritual beliefs, anything that God did make. Meaning that I do not hate the “humanity” that exists within any human being. However, God did not make the personal choices that humans make, regarding how they behave, and/or present themselves, to the world. So if a human being chooses, of their own free will to demonstrate their behavior with racism, bigotry, prejudice, and hatred for other humans, on the basis of their own free will choice as to how they define their spirituality within themselves, that is their own choice. So I do not hate any human being for being that which God did make. I hate only the choices and the manner in which humans have decided to demonstrate their behavior to one another. I do not hate religion. However, I will never give my support to “any” religion, that has ever caused harm to, or killed, a single human being, in any way, as a result of the religion demonstrating, or manifesting it’s presence in the world. If any religion has ever harmed or killed a single human being, I respect the right of all humans to believe what they want in life. I, personally, will under no circumstances give my support for any religion, or theological belief, that has ever harmed or killed even a single human being. This is what I have dedicated my life to as a spiritualist and a pacifist here on earth. So any attempt by anyone to portray me as hating anyone is a lie. Because that is not so. The foregoing clearly shows that I have no hatred for humankind or for any religion.

    ******************************************

    ******************************************

    My Pro-Life Statement

    For the record, I am pro-life . I do not support violence against, or the killing of any human being under any circumstances! And the only way that I ever deviate from that stand is that I do not believe that God has ever given any human the right to dictate to any woman how she is to arbitrate her life with the Almighty, and/or God . Therefore, I believe that all women deserve the right to choose for themselves the fate of their own bodies, pursuant to their relationship with the Almighty, and/or God . My position regarding this statement is more fully explained in my article entitled: Second Gear.

    ***********************************************

    The mind is like a book. Opened and much is learned. Closed and nothing is learned. (N. Maschke – 1994)

Lawsuits and Civil Rights Violations In Ohio:

General Further Reading:

Personal Further Reading:

My Significant Journal Entries:

  1. My Biographical Profile
  2. Public Declaration
  3. My Complete Medical Record Of My Caregiving For Aileen
  4. Finding Neverland
  5. How Do I love thee. The First Anniversary Of Aileen's Rosebush
  6. My Philosophy of Life
  7. Second Gear, My discussion of my Pro-Life, and Pro-Choice Position
  8. The Time I was hired to photograph and met President-elect Ronald Reagan
  9. My 250 Million Variable Characteristic Hieroglyphic Language
  10. My Global Warming Research
  11. Quantum Mechanics And Newtonian Metaphysics, Originally Dictated On Friday March 19, 2010 (two days before Aileen collapsed and was told she only had 2 months left to live
  12. Pressurized Moments
  13. Religion 101
  14. I Am An Iconoclastic Human Rights Advocate
  15. The Dark Lord
  16. Sand On The Floor
  17. A Human Comedy
  18. The Tortoise And The Hare
  19. Fear: One of Life's Great Motivators
  20. Give Me That Old Time Religion
  21. The Real Explanation of What’s Going On With Japan
  22. The Shadow People
  23. The Music Of The Spheres
  24. The Maschke Dynamic
  25. At Last
  26. Midnight Madness
  27. A Speck Of Dust On A Dirty Beach
  28. Choices of The Heart
  29. Oh There You Are
  30. Finding The Path
  31. Death Be Not Proud
  32. John Denver-The Box
  33. Relevancy
  34. The Environment Of My Mind
  35. The Dented Soul
  36. Talking To The Ghosts In My Heart
  37. A Rumpled And Misunderstood Life
  38. The Metaphysics of Hatred
  39. System Update: The Metaphysics Of Computing
  40. The Letter
  41. Human Rights
  42. Human Rights-An Analysis Part I
  43. Human Rights-An Analysis Part II
  44. Appearances Are Deceiving
  45. Unfinished Business
  46. The Velvet Hammer
  47. Reality Always Wins
  48. Midnight With The Iron Maiden
  49. The Difference Between Love And Hate
  50. System Update: Comprehensive
  51. Rummaging Through An Old Drawer
  52. Tidying Up
  53. Climbing The Mountain
  54. Clear Vision
  55. Dancing In The Backyard With My Weed Wacker
  56. Exercises In Multi-Directional Thinking
  57. Having Dinner At The Gates Of Hell
  58. Assured Distance
  59. The Dignity Of The Human Soul
  60. The Remarkable Thing
  61. Two … Three … One …
  62. Following The Footprints In The Sand
  63. Second Sight
  64. In The Midst Of Darkness A Single Spark Of Light Guides My Way
  65. Battling Demons In The Darkness
  66. Israel Hits Hamas Government Buildings
  67. Shadow Boxing
  68. Looking At Future's Past
  69. Circles Of Synchronicity
  70. Well That Was A Bad Idea

The mind is like a book. Opened and much is learned. Closed and nothing is learned. (N. Maschke – 1994)

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,