Are We There Yet?

Are We There Yet?
This is the sign that is over the front door of Aileen's and my house, our home, going OUT. Meaning that when someone leaves our house they are going into the ACTUAL Mental Ward.

I've always felt that way. When it is considered how much ugliness and killing and hatred there is in the world today, it actually makes perfect sense that this sign is over the door going out of the house.

Because that's where the real mental ward is.

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Grover Norquist: The tax pledge is forever

Grover Norquist: The tax pledge is forever

Mr. Norquist seems to be forgetting a very basic fact.  And that's basically because he really doesn't give a damn.  Any showing that by the way he is publicly acting.  Let's remember something.  The law is the law.

And that means that Mr. Norquist is not have any right as an American citizen to subvert the Constitution or to subvert the members of Congress by attempting to force them to pledge allegiance to and swear to give their life in defense of a private tax agreement, which is a private monetary agreement.  Because under constitutional law.  It is against the law for any American citizen to have as being more important than, or to pledge allegiance to or to pledge allegiance to defend and protect, above their duty to protect and defend the Constitution.

The Constitution is required, under federal law to be first and foremost, pursuant to any agenda private or public that any citizen might have.  This is the law.  Congressman Traficant was basically railroaded by the Republican Party for abiding by them Pledge of Allegiance to a private monetary agreement which he held as being more important than his duty to protect and defend the Constitution.  Therefore he violated constitutional law and he went to prison.

The Republican Party is in fact doing exactly the same thing as a result of the pressure being applied by Mr. Norquist.  Grover Norquist.  And as a result, Grover Norquist is by his own actions, attempting to subvert the Constitution and to subvert the members of Congress by making them agreed to a private monetary agreement which is exactly what Congressman Traficant did.  And, which falls under the jurisdiction of the RICO act.

So Mr. Norquist and say anything he wants about his private tax agreement.  But he is infecting attempting to cause the members of Congress to demonstrate and in fact behave in a fashion that can be described as nonfeasance.  Furthermore, as a result of Mr. Norquist attempting to force members of Congress to agree to a tax agreement.  Separate and having more importance than their duty to protect the Constitution of the United States.  Mr. Norquist is in fact attempting to subvert the Constitution.  Which is in fact classified under constitutional law.  As seditious behavior.

That is just the law, ladies and gentlemen.  So Mr. Norquist can say anything he wants.  But he basically attempting to write law, which he does not have the legal right to do.  Furthermore, as a result of his so-called tax agreement he is in fact attempting to subvert the members of Congress by placing them in a conflict of interest pursuant to their duty to protect and defend the Constitution.

Without all the hyperbole.  Grover Norquist is in fact by his own free choices demonstrating that he is in fact an enemy of the Constitution.  Because he is attempting to subvert the Constitution whereby he is saying that his tax agreement which is nothing to do with constitutional law, should have more importance to the members of Congress than their duty to protect and defend the Constitution with their lives.  And again that is an attempt to subvert the Constitution and is also looked upon as nonfeasance and also has potential seditious behavior both of which are classified under felonies.  With regard to constitutional law.

Added Mr. Norquist really wants to test his tax agreement all he needs to do is look back at the exact same circumstances legally as a legal precedent, in the case that happened between Congressman Traficant and the United States government.  You'll see very clearly that is private tax agreement is in fact an attempt of subversion of the Constitution.

Furthermore, that it is a fact an attempt to subvert constitutional law.  And that is something Mr. Norquist does not have the right to do.  No matter how badly he wants to have that right.

The foregoing doesn't even get involved with the fact that Mr. Norquist is basically saying by his own actions.  It is tax agreement is more important than allowing the members of Congress to do their job, which is to legislate on behalf of the American people.  Because the tax agreement in fact is not representative of the entire constituency of any of the members of Congress.  Because there are many members in their own constituencies who did not either sign that tax agreement or do not support that tax agreement and did not in any way offer forward any support for Mr. Norquist and his tax agreement.

Meaning that when Mr. Norquist says that the tax agreement is a promise to the members of Congress and their constituencies is that he is lying.  Because not every aspect of the members of Congress in fact is in agreement with the tax agreement to Mr. Norquist is causing the members of Congress to have to abide by.

Which of course in fact means that the members of Congress are in fact depriving aspects of their own constituency legal representation under constitutional law.  By virtue of the fact that the members of Congress are in fact Pledge of Allegiance to and swearing to protect and defend this tax agreement above their duty to protect and defend the Constitution.  Thereby disenfranchising sections of their constituencies.  Meaning that those sections of the constituencies that do not support the tax agreement are in fact not being given adequate representation under the law which then of course is a federal violation of constitutional law which is no taxation without representation.

Mr. Norquist will not be able under any circumstances to prove it every single member of every single constituency of every member of Congress who is in fact pledge allegiance to that tax agreement and supporting actress agreement is in fact supporting that tax agreement.  And if there is even 10 or five or even one constituent that does not support the tax agreement that means that that member of Congress is depriving that member of their constituency legal representation under the law thereby committing the felony of no taxation without representation.

This is the law, ladies and gentlemen, as I said it's boring.  It's not fun and it has to do with that old saying that most people don't want to deal with, which is reality.

Grover Norquist is attempting to subvert the Constitution.  And it's extremely clear that he is doing so.  What is not clear to me is that we the people of this nation are not recognizing this.  Mr. Grover Norquist, and using all sorts of propaganda oriented language in order to try to lie to the American people about the nature of this tax agreement.  But the tax agreement is a pledge.  It is not part of constitutional law.  And this nation does not run on the basis of pledges.  This nation is run on the basis of constitutional law.  That is the difference.

And since his tax agreement is not part of any aspect of constitutional law pursuant to the legal votes and the legal duties of the members of Congress.  The members of Congress are in fact causing themselves to disenfranchise certain aspects of their constituency.  Plus they are at the same time refusing to do their duty pursuant to constitutional law and their oath of office by virtue the fact that they're putting more importance on and Pledge of Allegiance to this tax agreement above and beyond their duty to protect and defend the Constitution.

And that is exactly what Congressman Traficant did earlier in the history of this Congress.  And when that happened the Republican Party sighted Trevor get under the RICO act.  And he was doing exactly the same thing at this tax agreement offered by Grover Norquist is doing.  Sunna matter what.  Why Grover Norquist Mitel and the matter how many lies the tea party my Dell or the Republican Party my child.  Because that's what they're doing.  They are lying.  And they know they are lying.  And they know that the congressional attorneys around the country are looking at them and wanting this matter investigated.

That is why I'm calling upon all like-minded American citizens who believe in the Constitution.  And believe that the members of Congress are required to fulfill their duty under the Constitution immediately contact the Department of Justice request a formal investigation into the activities of Grover Norquist and all the Republican Party and the tea party who have signed this tax agreement and who are refusing to place more importance on their duty pursuant to constitutional law.  Then they are this tax agreement.

We the people of this nation need to take back our nation from these activists who are right-wing extremist to are trying to subvert the Constitution.  Because that is what Grover Norquist is trying to do.  And we the people can not allow this to happen.  The law is the law.  This nation has to remain a nation of laws because the moment that we take away the laws of this nation.  We don't have a country anymore.

If Mr. Norquist would like to meet me in any court of law.  He wants.  I have no problem whatsoever.  I have no problem going into any court and showing very clearly that the legal precedent that took place with Congressman Traficant is exactly the same thing that is happening right now with Grover Norquist and his tax agreement that he is pressuring the members of Congress to abide by above and beyond their duty to protect and defend the Constitution.  And when that is proven in court Grover Norquist will realize that he has in fact committed a felony in this country.  And he is causing the members of Congress to do the same.  That is the law.  And this now comes down to an information war.

Grover Norquist on one side with the Republican Party and the tea party using propaganda to lie to the American people about the true nature of this tax agreement and lying saying that everyone in the constituencies of these different members of Congress is in fact being represented.  When that is not the case.  Grover Norquist cannot certifiably prove in any court of law that every single member of every member of Congress and their constituency is in fact in favor of this tax agreement.  Because there were many people who voted for the tea party and the Republican Party who knew nothing of this tax agreement and did not care about the tax agreement nor did they support the tax agreement.

We know that's true because of the exit polls that were taken with regard to the voting process.  And we know that's true, because we know from the demographics of the different constituencies that not every single member of every constituency is in favor of the tax agreement.  Meaning that Grover Norquist cannot prove in court that every member of the constituency from every member of Congress to sign off on that tax agreement is actually getting adequate representation under the law.

And when Grover Norquist is not able to prove that in a court of law.  It will then be evident to the law and to the court the Grover Norquist is attempting to subvert the Constitution and to disenfranchise sections of the constituencies of the different members of Congress who are not in favor of the tax agreement.  Which makes object agreement not only proprietary but it also makes it is subversive to the Constitution by virtue of the fact that he is in fact forcing the members of Congress to abide by the tax agreement whereby as a result sections of their constituencies are being disenfranchised and deprived equal representation under the law.  Which again is nonfeasance and subversion of the Constitution.  And of course taxation without representation.

Of course you Grover Norquist has the demographics to prove that every single human being who voted for every single member of Congress in every single constituency.
The tax agreement and supported the tax agreement he will have to prove that legally in a court of law.  And it is not able to prove that all of the constituencies every single human being is in favor of that tax agreement or that they supported the tax agreement or that they knew of the tax agreement than that will certify in a court of law that certain aspects of the constituency were not aware of the agreement I do not support the agreement and therefore because of the fact that the Republican Party is supporting the tax agreement above and beyond their duty to support the Constitution they are in fact not giving representation to that aspect of their constituencies and thereby taxing them without representation which is a federal crime under federal law.

That's the law, ladies and gentlemen.  And as I said it Grover Norquist wants to argue this with me in court.  I have no problem.  Because this tax agreement is an attempt to impeach aspects of the Constitution and to abrogate certain civil liberties of sections of the population who are not in support of the tax agreement which is then of course again causing no taxation without representation to in fact take place in the Congress, because they are not giving complete and adequate representation to their entire constituency.

That's the law, ladies and gentlemen.  And Grover Norquist may think he happens to know more about the law than anyone else.  But the fact of the matter is he is a liar.  Because he is lying to the American people he is lying to the American government is attempting to subvert the American government and he is attempting to subvert the Constitution as a result of the foregoing.  Which is why I am again asking for all like-minded Americans to contact the department of justice in my see also section below and request a formal investigation into the activities of Grover Norquist and all of his associates and their supporters and the Republican Party and their associates and supporters along with the tea party and their associates and supporters.  And to do this on the basis of the grounds of nonfeasance, possible violations of the RICO act, and an attempt of subversion of the Constitution which can in fact be defined under federal law as possible sedition behavior to the Constitution.

The legal precedents I'm siding of course are the case with Congressman Traficant.  But I'm also citing Shays rebellion, pursuant to the articles of Confederation that was in fact the law of the United States, until the United States enacted the Constitution of these United States to resolve the problem of no taxation without representation, which they did in 1789.

Furthermore, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court, has said, that it is impossible for anyone to protect and defend the Constitution.  When they are actively engaged in either impeaching or abrogating the Constitution in any way, shape, or form.

By virtue of what I've explained above, Grover Norquist is in fact attempting subversion of the Constitution along with the other charges I've mentioned.  Therefore, Grover Norquist is in fact guilty of attempting to cause the members of the United States Congress to possibly impeach and to abrogate the civil liberties of certain members of their constituencies based on their agreement pursuant to this tax agreement.  And that is a felony under federal law.

So once again I am asking for all like-minded Americans who believe as I do that.  The Constitution of these United States is under attack by the right wing extremists in these United States and the Republican Party and the tea party and Grover Norquist to contact the Department of Justice immediately and ask for a formal investigation into the activities of Grover Norquist his associates Republican Party their associates the tea party and their associates and all the people who are representing them on the basis of the foregoing potential charges that may in fact taking place as a result of this tax agreement.

It's really sad.  So we are all Americans.  And yet the fact is, so many people will yell and scream about their legal constitutional rights but only when they want them for themselves very of the right wing extremists are excellent at this because they do everything they can to get all the rights to can for themselves.  And then do everything they can at the same time, to deprive those rights to anyone else.  And that's exactly what this tax agreement it's.  Because that's exactly what Congressman Traficant and other members of Congress have done in the past and they have all gone to prison.  One of the aspects of was used to secure the legal definition of criminal activity was in fact the RICO act.  But when looking at constitutional law the concept of nonfeasance and potentially malfeasance in fact also exists.

And as I said, this condition is existing.  Because the members of Congress are failing to fulfill their oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution.  Because are putting more value on this tax agreement and by doing that there are members of their own constituency who are not getting adequate representation in the Congress.  Because these members of Congress are looking only at the tax agreement not the congressional duty.  Not their duty to their constituents.  Because not every constituent supports the agreement.  And Grover Norquist can't prove that they all do area anyand so do the right wing extremists.  Because when you look at the demographics of where every member of the Republican Party has come from getting their districts and their constituencies.  You'll see that not air every single person in their constituencies or their districts is in support of that tax agreement.  And anyone who is not in support of that tax agreement is not getting the equal representation by any of the members of Congress who are supporting the agreement because they're not included in the agreement.

And that is an act of abrogation or and attempt to abrogate the civil liberties and the civil rights of certain sections of the constituencies in the general population on the basis of this tax agreement which then makes the tax agreement subject to potential violations under the RICO act and under the legal definition of nonfeasance and possibly malfeasance and most certainly under the definition of an attempt to subvert the Constitution based on the legal precedents I have cited above.

As I said, ladies and gentlemen, the law is boring but that's what this is all about the law.  And again of Grover Norquist thinks if he has a case, no problem.  I will meet him in any federal court he wants and when I'm done talking.  When I'm done bringing forth the legal precedents involved.  It will be very clear.  The Grover Norquist is doing exactly what I'm saying that he is attempting to subvert the Constitution and heand so do the Republican Party.  That's why in Florida the Republican Party is under investigation for constitutional violations.  With regard to the voting laws in Florida.  Because this is exactly what is motivating the Republican Party and the tea party right now.  They don't like the Constitution they hate the Constitution.  They hate the American people they hate everyone in this country who is not white and Christian.  And wealthy and that's what this tax agreement is all about the Republican Party is attempting to steal civil liberties away from the middle class and the lower classes in this country, especially those who are not white and Christian.  And that, ladies and gentlemen is a felony under constitutional law.

The Republican Party knows this, the tea party knows this and now it's simply a matter of informational war.  Because the tea party, the Republican Party will spend millions and millions of dollars lying to everyone in this country to spend millions of dollars on propaganda to lie to everyone to lie to the entire world.  So that they can try to get everyone in the entire world to believe that the only way to help our American veterans and our soldiers in the military is by taking as many benefits away from them and taking all their health benefits away from American veterans who have children with autism and taking away health care for cancer patients, and by basically miss treating the poor.  Because that's what Republicans believe that the only way to achieve economic stability is to miss treat the poor and the middle class is much as possible take everything away from us that they possibly can so that they the members of Congress to make sure they get their congressional pay raise and also so that they can give the money they are taking away from us and the services they are taking away from us to Grover Norquist and Donald Trump and all their wealthy friends.  Because the Republican Party basically hates everyone in this country who is not wealthy.  Or it white Christian.

And that's was driving the.  And that's where it comes down to.  We the people of this nation either have to call the Department of Justice and request a formal recall of the Congress to get these members of Congress out of office so that we do away with this tax agreement or we have to have everyone involved with the tax agreement investigated by the Department of Justice for the charges I have stated above or the potential charges I have stated above.  Because I'm not the court.  I'm just telling you what I know about constitutional law and Norquist is violating constitutional law.

I came from two generations of US Supreme Court attorneys.  And I have successfully brought a case myself to the Supreme Court, pursuant to a constitutional violation.  The court remanded that case down to a lower court in order to be able to set up the legal justification for the Supreme Court to accept that case.  At which point my attorney at the time and I decided was in the best interest not to move forward with the cases on record.

Some tell you once again if Norquist wants to go into court and prove to the entire world that that tax agreement has the backing of every single human being in every single constituency pursuant to that tax agreement and the members of Congress who are represented by those constituencies he will have to prove that with actual documentation that every single human being in every single constituency supports that tax agreement.  And if they don't then that tax agreement is representative not of the entire constituency.  But basically, a proprietary tax agreement representing only a fraction.  Or a segment of the constituency thereby forcing taxation with no representation on that part of the constituency that does not support the tax agreement.

This is the part of the story where we now have to listen to the Republican Party and the tea party and Grover Norquist doing all sorts of publications and public appearances where they are going to live the American people and try to get everyone to believe that the tax agreement has more importance than constitutional law.

But I'm telling you right here and now that when that day happens when the United States ceases to be based upon constitutional law.  Meaning, the Constitution of these United States.  That's when the United States would no longer be, the United States.


See Also:

The mind is like a book. Opened and much is learned. Closed and nothing is learned. (N. Maschke – 1994)

"THEY CAME FIRST for the Communists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist.

THEN THEY CAME for the Jews,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.

THEN THEY CAME for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist.

THEN THEY CAME for the Catholics,
and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant.

THEN THEY CAME for me
and by that time no one was left to speak up."

Pastor Martin Niemöller

      Child Poverty Statistics:

    • 25,000 children die each day from poverty
    • 1041 children die every hour due to poverty
    • 17 children die every minute from poverty
    • 750,000 children die every month from poverty
    • 9,000,000 children die every year from poverty

    Child mortality Statistics:

    • 9.2 million children die every year
    • 780,000 children die every month
    • 26,000 children die every day
    • 18 children die every minute

    An estimated 9.2 million children under the age of five will die this year – nearly 26,000 per day or 18 every minute. This is greater than the annual number of deaths from 1. AIDS (2 million), malaria (900,000), and tuberculosis (1.5 million) combined. 2. Neonatal disorders, pneumonia and diarrhea are the major causes of under-five mortality.

    Globally, 80 percent of all child deaths are due to only a handful of causes: neonatal causes, pneumonia, diarrhea, and malaria. 3. Pneumonia or sepsis, pre-term delivery, and asphyxia at birth are the leading causes of neonatal deaths. Malnutrition is responsible for over a third of child deaths.

    From: http://www.globalhealth.org/child_health/child_mortality/

    And, according to recent United States statistics, there are approximately 43,000 suicides that take place, in the United States every single year. That would be one suicide taking place, by children as young as 12, or possibly younger, up to our oldest citizens. Approximately every 15 minutes.

    Not one single penny that the pro-life movement spends on their so-called pro-life movement goes toward saving any of these “living” children’s lives. Not one single cent. Which means that not one single cent of the so-called pro-life movement is being used to save any of the amazing children and absolutely fantastic women, and men, who are being killed, or suffering horribly, every single minute. so naturally, it becomes impossible to conclude that the pro-life movement is pro-life at all, if they will not even save the lives of living children and men and women. But will always only be concerned with, and define life as the “fetus” only. And THAT’S NOT how their own God Jesus Christ defines life, in their own Bible.

    Which means that the pro-life movement is not pro-life at all. Because their money is “not” going to save any living life on this planet. Their money is only going toward forcing women to bear children against their will. And that’s not how their own God, Jesus Christ defines pro-life.

If The Almighty will not allow the smallest sparrow to fall from the sky, why, should we, the creations of that same Almighty, do any less?

    *******************************************

    With 78% of the population of the United States being Christian, (US Religious Demographic Statistics ) that also means that 78% of all the:

    incidents that take place every year, are committed by approximately 78% of the population, meaning people who claim to be Christians. (US Religious Demographic Statistics ). And that is something that the Christian conservatives , and those who are Catholics, never seem to want to discuss, and in many, if not most, cases, will lie about. Unless they are forced to do so, and/or tell the truth, in a court of law.


    And again, their own God, Jesus Christ says in their own Bible, not to judge anyone, and not to hurt anything that God makes. That’s anything. So, these statistics are really meant to illustrate about being responsible for one’s own choices and actions. That would be, in their own Bible, free-will choices and free-will actions.

    ******************************************

    My Statement On Religion

    For the record, I do not now, nor have I ever hated any human being on earth. I do not hate, regarding my spirituality, and spiritual beliefs, anything that God did make. Meaning that I do not hate the “humanity” that exists within any human being. However, God did not make the personal choices that humans make, regarding how they behave, and/or present themselves, to the world. So if a human being chooses, of their own free will to demonstrate their behavior with racism, bigotry, prejudice, and hatred for other humans, on the basis of their own free will choice as to how they define their spirituality within themselves, that is their own choice. So I do not hate any human being for being that which God did make. I hate only the choices and the manner in which humans have decided to demonstrate their behavior to one another. I do not hate religion. However, I will never give my support to “any” religion, that has ever caused harm to, or killed, a single human being, in any way, as a result of the religion demonstrating, or manifesting it’s presence in the world. If any religion has ever harmed or killed a single human being, I respect the right of all humans to believe what they want in life. I, personally, will under no circumstances give my support for any religion, or theological belief, that has ever harmed or killed even a single human being. This is what I have dedicated my life to as a spiritualist and a pacifist here on earth. So any attempt by anyone to portray me as hating anyone is a lie. Because that is not so. The foregoing clearly shows that I have no hatred for humankind or for any religion.

    ******************************************

    ******************************************

    My Pro-Life Statement

    For the record, I am pro-life . I do not support violence against, or the killing of any human being under any circumstances! And the only way that I ever deviate from that stand is that I do not believe that God has ever given any human the right to dictate to any woman how she is to arbitrate her life with the Almighty, and/or God . Therefore, I believe that all women deserve the right to choose for themselves the fate of their own bodies, pursuant to their relationship with the Almighty, and/or God . My position regarding this statement is more fully explained in my article entitled: Second Gear.

    ***********************************************

    The mind is like a book. Opened and much is learned. Closed and nothing is learned. (N. Maschke – 1994)

Lawsuits and Civil Rights Violations In Ohio:

General Further Reading:

 

Personal Further Reading:

My Significant Journal Entries:

  1. My Biographical Profile
  2. Public Declaration
  3. My Complete Medical Record Of My Caregiving For Aileen
  4. Finding Neverland
  5. How Do I love thee. The First Anniversary Of Aileen's Rosebush
  6. My Philosophy of Life
  7. Second Gear, My discussion of my Pro-Life, and Pro-Choice Position
  8. The Time I was hired to photograph and met President-elect Ronald Reagan
  9. My 250 Million Variable Characteristic Hieroglyphic Language
  10. My Global Warming Research
  11. Quantum Mechanics And Newtonian Metaphysics, Originally Dictated On Friday March 19, 2010 (two days before Aileen collapsed and was told she only had 2 months left to live
  12. Pressurized Moments
  13. Religion 101
  14. I Am An Iconoclastic Human Rights Advocate
  15. The Dark Lord
  16. Sand On The Floor
  17. A Human Comedy
  18. The Tortoise And The Hare
  19. Fear: One of Life's Great Motivators
  20. Give Me That Old Time Religion
  21. The Real Explanation of What’s Going On With Japan
  22. The Shadow People
  23. The Music Of The Spheres
  24. The Maschke Dynamic
  25. At Last
  26. Midnight Madness
  27. A Speck Of Dust On A Dirty Beach
  28. Choices of The Heart
  29. Oh There You Are
  30. Finding The Path
  31. Death Be Not Proud
  32. John Denver-The Box
  33. Relevancy
  34. The Environment Of My Mind
  35. The Dented Soul
  36. Talking To The Ghosts In My Heart
  37. A Rumpled And Misunderstood Life
  38. The Metaphysics of Hatred
  39. System Update: The Metaphysics Of Computing
  40. The Letter
  41. Human Rights
  42. Human Rights-An Analysis Part I
  43. Human Rights-An Analysis Part II
  44. Appearances Are Deceiving
  45. Unfinished Business
  46. The Velvet Hammer
  47. Reality Always Wins
  48. Midnight With The Iron Maiden
  49. The Difference Between Love And Hate
  50. System Update: Comprehensive
  51. Rummaging Through An Old Drawer
  52. Tidying Up
  53. Climbing The Mountain
  54. Clear Vision
  55. Dancing In The Backyard With My Weed Wacker
  56. Exercises In Multi-Directional Thinking
  57. Having Dinner At The Gates Of Hell
  58. Assured Distance
  59. The Dignity Of The Human Soul
  60. The Remarkable Thing
  61. Two … Three … One …
  62. Following The Footprints In The Sand
  63. Second Sight
  64. In The Midst Of Darkness A Single Spark Of Light Guides My Way
  65. Battling Demons In The Darkness
  66. Israel Hits Hamas Government Buildings
  67. Shadow Boxing
  68. Looking At Future's Past
  69. Circles Of Synchronicity
  70. Well That Was A Bad Idea

The mind is like a book. Opened and much is learned. Closed and nothing is learned. (N. Maschke – 1994)


Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,